the perils of indifference thesis
Change ). Elie Wiesel sincerely believes the only way to stop the evils of the 20th century from bleeding into the 21st century is to choose not to be indifferent.

His use of powerful diction -such as “betray”, “abandon”, “suffering” “anger”- all promotes the same intense and powerful tone, and he sporadicly uses anaphora to extend the passion in his message such as instances where he says “You fight it, You denounce it. Intro- Elie Weisel, author of Perils of Indifference, has used his real life experience, along with his ability use the three forms of rhetorical appeal to captivate his audience and leaves their heart and mind dwelling on his message. That is why he is able to make many more speeches, construct many more arguments, and make many more advancements of movements, that can be just as effective as this speech. Introduction to the author, and when and whom the speech was given. Is Ignorance Bliss? Don’t miss a chance to chat with experts. Section 1: Logos are used in the Perils of Indifference to Appeal to the reader’s logic. He was one of few lucky ones who escaped the camps alive, while his family was part of millions who were not so lucky. He does it so flawlessly with his ability to combine the fervency derived from his past and the skills he has obtained throughout his career as a great novelist. Speech Given April 12, 1999 in Washington DC to various dignitaries including President and Mrs. Clinton, members of the Congress, and Ambassador Holbrooke. In his Speech “Perils of Indifference”, Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel uses logic (logos) and emotion (pathos) to confront Americans on their resolve to change. Another type of rhetorical question that Wiesel used were “suggestive” questions. Using these appeals to the reader’s character, also known as ethos. ”. Define Pathos, and talk about how emotionally charged literature grabs the readers attention and makes them take notice. Allusion is another literary device used to Wiesel’s advantage in this argument. As an experienced and successful novelist, Wiesel was well aware that if he wanted to get people to really understand what he meant when he said “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred. There were many instances were Wiesel would insert long chains of rhetorical questions one right after the other. Retrieved from, We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Instead, Wiesel took the approach of using the figurative devices of asking rhetorical questions and setting up allusions to make his argument relatable, understandable, reliable, and most importantly: agreeable. Bring together all points and wrap up paper. Explain how the writer utilizes pathos in the speech to draw on the reader emotions. Initially, if Wiesel was to go on and on about indifference in general, the audience might be less engaged. ( Log Out /  Wiesel certainly makes it clear through his prominent uses of rhetorical questions and allusion that indifference creates a threat to the humanity everyone possesses somewhere within, and uses examples of his time in Auschwitz as an example of what damaging and painful effects indifference can inflict upon others.

can use them for free to gain inspiration and new creative ideas for their writing assignments. Rhetorical questions that are suggestive enhance Wiesel’s position, and this injection forces the audience to come to Wiesel’s conclusion, while still feeling as though the conclusion is their own. on, Perils of Indifference or Is Ignorance Bliss. In line 52, Wiesel says, "Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred." Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. The result became one of his most famously publicized works. For example, “How is one to explain their indifference? , he couldn’t just talk at his audience, he had to ask questions to engage them. Have you experienced indifference in your own life? Every minute one of them dies of diseases, violence, famine. The book, Night (English translation version), only represented the beginning of a flourishing career as a political activist and novelist. Using these appeals to the reader’s character, also known as ethos.

According to Elie Wiesel, "indifference" is defined simply as "no difference." In his Speech “Perils of Indifference”, Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel uses logic (logos) and emotion (pathos) to confront Americans on their resolve to change. But it's actually much more complicated and nuanced, especially when talking about indifference toward human suffering throughout the world. Years after that, he became a journalist and eventually was convinced to finally write about his experiences with the Holocaust. His goal is to have the audience establish their own connections and inferences, which he does through creating relative allusions, then asking relevant rhetorical questions. Define logos, and why a writer would want to appeal to a readers logic. Then once more at the end, he retells that brief anecdote, and uses the idea of his childhood still accompanying him as a metaphor for how events that had transpired during his childhood: How the past he has carried with him to this day and is what has made him into the novelist the audience sees before them. What evidence does he give to support that statement? Elie Weisel, born-1928, young Jewish boy from the Carpathian Mountains, rescued from a concentration camp. PhDessay is an educational resource where over 1,000,000 free essays are collected. The horrors he faced as a boy forged the man that would go on to write all of these magnificent works; the neglect and ignorance of those events that occurred during the Holocaust influenced and inspired him to warn people of the dangerous woes of indifference. Of course there were other literary elements in this speech that made Wiesel’s argument all that more effective. (2017, May 03). Do we feel their pain, their agony? Three possible thesis statements: The speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, by Elie Wiesel, is a very strong emotionally spoken speech to President Clinton and other members of Congress to convince them how indifference can impact the next generation in a positive way. Be sure to bring in examples from the text of the different techniques. Elie Wiesel understood better than most people the consequences of ignoring what's happening around you. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Define ethos, and touch on how this affects a reader by making them feel as if their character is in question. To this day, no one knows what influenced FDR to make certain decisions, but based on Wiesel’s persistent argument, it can be presumed that indifference played a major role in some of FDR’s decisions. Thesis Statement- Are humans capable of change? Perils of Indifference...Perils of Indifference Wiesel develops his assertion by providing references to events in which action, rather than indifference,that could have saved countless lives; for example, Wiesel mentions both world wars, the assassinations of the Kennedys and Dr. Martin Luther King jr., and also of the numerous civil wars. The main claim that Wiesel makes is that indifference is a dehumanizing state which works to the benefit of oppressors by allowing their actions to continue unchallenged, and that it is human duty to avoid indifference and take a stance against suffering. Anger can at times be creative. However, questions don’t have to require answers, and in a speech as passionate and carefully articulated as this one, a Q & A every thirty seconds would drown out his point among all of the redundant tangents the conversation could take off in. Remember. For instance, when he talks about how “It is so much easier to look away from the victims” when referencing “behind the black gates of Auschwitz” and “the most tragic of all prisoners”, since the Holocaust is a universally accepted tragedy, indifference is related to that event, and is therefore conceived as a trait with demonic properties. Is a philosophy of indifference conceivable?
Is it necessary at times to practice it simply to keep one’s sanity, live normally, enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine, as the world around us experiences harrowing upheavals? They were dead and did not know it. Then by displaying indifference in many kinds of scenarios, going to this extent allows Wiesel to create effectiveness with his allusions. Even when he says, “Do we hear their pleas? Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. ”. Weisel uses Ethos to question whether the reader is practicing indifference in their own lives. You fight it. Do you agree with him? ( Log Out /  Scholars By establishing the allusion that reinforces how terrible the Holocaust was, the rhetorical question regarding why FDR did not take more action became much more influential. Though risky or even overwhelming, these questions made the direction of his argument easier to control. Here, Wiesel uses the device to get his audience to participate in his argument as well as hear it. Describe how using rhetorical appeals have helped Weisel become so successful. The first rhetorical question is responded to with his next idea: Is it a philosophy? Such themes are the underlying basis of his message in his speech The Perils of Indifference. ” or “They no longer felt pain, hunger thirst. Shocker, we know, but indifference is a major theme in a speech called "The Perils of Indifference." Elie wiesel the perils of indifference thesis writing Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate, Elie Wiesel, gave this impassioned speech within the East Room within the White-colored-colored-colored House on April 12, 1999, incorporated inside the Millennium Lecture series, located by President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. He came to the United States and continued writing about his life and political ideologies, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986 for works that diligently argued for ending oppression, hatred, and racism. ” are unanswerable. ( Log Out /  They felt nothing. But indifference is never creative. But more than that, he wanted his audience to recognize that being indifferent is not the same as being innocent—in fact, being indifferent or turning a blind eye to bad things makes you part of the problem. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. ” However, Wiesel doesn’t let the indifference that affected his childhood so heavily deny who he is, and what he cares about. Section 2: Weisel used pathos to draw on the reader’s emotions.

Sections 3: Ethos are a rhetorical appeal used to draw in the reader’s character. They feared nothing. Lecturing an audience for any extended period of time is never an ideal way to convey one’s message effectively. If guidelines have been set prior to these questions, an audiences’ conclusions are likely to further support his argument. “Perils of Indifference” is an extremely emotional piece due to its subject matter.


Lisa Malambri Model, Jonathan Clay Moore Death, Debbi Peterson Net Worth, Euthymol Toothpaste Side Effects, Who Is Sara Sidner Married To, Noticiero Univision Cast, Tropico 6 Ranch Fertility, Zoe Laverne Number, How Do You Wish Someone Happy Birthday In Heaven, Dri Avast Software, Is The American Dream Still Possible By David Wallechinsky Essays, Is Belcamp Md Safe, Fire Tv Stick Stuck On Amazon Logo, Nicole Panattoni Net Worth, Joseph Joseph Chopping Board Set Costco, Rafael Angel Uribe Serna, Reshma Shetty Matrix, Chet Holmgren Crystal Ball, Freaky Girl Quotes, Chris Thorsteinson Wife, Hawaiian God Kane, Jonathan Clay Moore Death, Debbi Peterson Net Worth, Euthymol Toothpaste Side Effects, Who Is Sara Sidner Married To, Noticiero Univision Cast, Tropico 6 Ranch Fertility, Zoe Laverne Number, How Do You Wish Someone Happy Birthday In Heaven, Dri Avast Software, Is The American Dream Still Possible By David Wallechinsky Essays, Is Belcamp Md Safe,